harry-tuttle
|||||
Sorry dass es kein Deutsch ist, aber ich habe es für einen anderen Zweck erstellt, dachte ich poste es mal, wen es interessiert (ich kann auch gerne noch einen Deutschen Text nachliefern, wenn gewünscht).
Hier zum Thema:
----start------
This test is not a 100% accurate science test, this was done as best as I could and due to couriosity. I send the same midi informatioon to the same patches of the emulator DSP5630 and the Virus Indigo I, which I own.
I recorded the Indigo straight into a Fireface UFX+, no effects. I recorded all Patches matched setting the clock to 120bpm, not touching the default patches, all with same volume.
Then I tried to match each recorded track of the same patch from the emulator and Indigo to be of equal volume via the Waves WML Stereo analyzer. First curious thing I noticed, I had to gain the various patches from the Indigo a bit differently, so they were output a bit differently compared to the Emu each one.
In the recorded demo, you hear first 2 bars at 120bpm the EMU, then 2 bars the Indigo, then EMU again 2 bars then Indigo, then after 8 bars the same while switching to a different preset, then after 4 Presets switching them all 4 on at once of the EMU first for full 8 bars, then the Indigo 8 bars last.
To be honest, I found the Emu better in this case, even though not all nuances seem to have been matched emulation patch wise, like the small delays or FX in the third Indigo Patch seem still not there in the Emu, but those instances of Presets that didnt match were super rare, otherwise they seemed almost always identical to me. As one can hear, the Emu tracks are better synced, not sure why the patches from the Indigo didnt match up 100% same tightness feeling as on the emu (even though they were triggered by the exact same midi sequences, I guess it is due to some latency of the whole hardware recording process, while the emu tracks were recorded internally/aka bounced. I didnt bother to correct those minimal latencies from the hw recordings, so excuse the supertiny hiccups when switching sometimes the presets.
Me personally who uses hardware and often finds plugins lacking am really impressed, so much to say that this might be a tipping point where 100% digital hardware emulated might become obsolete, not regarding the controls, haptics and feeling of owning a piece of hardware of course, but a moment possibly conmparable to MAME when you had so close to accurate emulation from the original chips, that it was yet another level compared to other attempts like converted cloneson e.g. homecomputers or consoles.
-------end---
Als Verfechter von Hardware fand ich es allemal spannend, so einen Test durchzuführen
Hier zum Thema:
----start------
This test is not a 100% accurate science test, this was done as best as I could and due to couriosity. I send the same midi informatioon to the same patches of the emulator DSP5630 and the Virus Indigo I, which I own.
I recorded the Indigo straight into a Fireface UFX+, no effects. I recorded all Patches matched setting the clock to 120bpm, not touching the default patches, all with same volume.
Then I tried to match each recorded track of the same patch from the emulator and Indigo to be of equal volume via the Waves WML Stereo analyzer. First curious thing I noticed, I had to gain the various patches from the Indigo a bit differently, so they were output a bit differently compared to the Emu each one.
In the recorded demo, you hear first 2 bars at 120bpm the EMU, then 2 bars the Indigo, then EMU again 2 bars then Indigo, then after 8 bars the same while switching to a different preset, then after 4 Presets switching them all 4 on at once of the EMU first for full 8 bars, then the Indigo 8 bars last.
To be honest, I found the Emu better in this case, even though not all nuances seem to have been matched emulation patch wise, like the small delays or FX in the third Indigo Patch seem still not there in the Emu, but those instances of Presets that didnt match were super rare, otherwise they seemed almost always identical to me. As one can hear, the Emu tracks are better synced, not sure why the patches from the Indigo didnt match up 100% same tightness feeling as on the emu (even though they were triggered by the exact same midi sequences, I guess it is due to some latency of the whole hardware recording process, while the emu tracks were recorded internally/aka bounced. I didnt bother to correct those minimal latencies from the hw recordings, so excuse the supertiny hiccups when switching sometimes the presets.
Me personally who uses hardware and often finds plugins lacking am really impressed, so much to say that this might be a tipping point where 100% digital hardware emulated might become obsolete, not regarding the controls, haptics and feeling of owning a piece of hardware of course, but a moment possibly conmparable to MAME when you had so close to accurate emulation from the original chips, that it was yet another level compared to other attempts like converted cloneson e.g. homecomputers or consoles.
-------end---
Als Verfechter von Hardware fand ich es allemal spannend, so einen Test durchzuführen
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
